Self-reliance—Virtue or Vanity?

Emerson’s essay on this topic is inspiring isn’t it? But as articulate, logical and inspiring as Emerson’s essays are, I think that the sage of Concord was articulating, rather than inventing, the values of a national culture that prides itself on the perceived self-sufficiency of those who settled our country.

But is the source of our country’s historic strength really to be found in this idealized notion of self-reliance, or is it to be found rather in the qualities that made another concept possible: e pluribus unum—out of many, one? It seems to me that being able to create a unified vision out of many cultures and languages is a far more noteworthy achievement than boasting of pride in owing nothing to anyone.

Isn’t this—creating a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts--what the “third sector” is all about?

If our nation leaves a legacy to the human race, it will be perhaps because we could show that mankind could rise above its tribal past to create something greater. I recall an anthropologist describing an ancient hominoid skeleton that had lost its arm in an accident. It would have been impossible for that hominoid to have survived such a wound, but the wound had healed—showing that there had been someone else who cared enough and who knew enough to save his life. It was with this realization that the anthropologist knew he was looking at the remains of a human being and that mankind had emerged from his animal origins.